The State Of Maharashtra v. Jeevan Zatingrao Dabhade

criap1608.13 (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1608 OF 2013 The State of Maharashtra ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Jeevan Zatingrao Dabhade ..RESPONDENT Mr R.V. Dasalkar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for applicant; Mr S.B. Madde, Advocate for respondent CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 27th September, 2016 ORAL ORDER :

Heard respective Counsel.

2.

Respondent-accused was acquitted in Special Case (ACB) No.7/2005 (Old No.1 of 2004), on the ground that there was discrepancy in the evidence of P.Ws. 1, 2 and the complainant. 3.

Upon hearing respective Counsel, in my opinion, case for grant of leave is made out. Hence, leave granted.

4.

Admit.

5.

Mr Madde, learned Counsel waives service of notice on behalf of respondent.

6.

Action under section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (N.W. SAMBRE, J.) amj