Satish Babasaheb Thosar And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through The Collector, Beed And ANR

2025:BHC-AUG:17534 1 98 ca 3882.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3882 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 8968 OF 2025 Satish Babasaheb Thosar and another .. Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Dnyaneshwar A. Bide, Advocate for the Applicants. Shri D. B. Bhange, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. WITH C. A. NO. 3883 OF 2025 IN F. A. ST. NO. 8970 OF 2025 C. A. NO. 3884 OF 2025 IN F. A. ST. NO. 8966 OF 2025 CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 07TH JULY, 2025.

FINAL ORDER :

.

Heard Mr. Bide, learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A. G. P. for the respondent No. 1. None appears for the respondent/acquiring body. For the reasons stated in the civil applications, delay stands condoned. The civil applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. The civil applications are disposed of. Office is directed to register the first appeals. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ] bsb/July 25