Khaisar Nisa Begum Ataullahkhan v. O.I.C.Records A.M.C. Record Office, Lukhnow (U.P), And Others

36 wp.5426.14.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5426 OF 2014 KHAISAR NISA BEGUM ATAULLAHKHAN

VERSUS

O.I.C.RECORDS A.M.C. RECORD OFFICE, LUKHNOW (U.P), AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Dalal Arun G.

AGP for Respondents: Mr.G.K.Thigale.

Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. Paithankar Prakash B. ...

CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA and N. W. SAMBRE, JJ.

DATE :

29th January, 2015.

P.C.:

.

Mr.Paithankar, learned counsel submits that verification is required to be done of the Petitioner with the defence. As verification is not yet done, the amount of pension is not yet released to the Petitioner nor the Bank has received it.

Mr.Dalal, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondents are insisting to get the verification done by the learned Judge of the District Court or the District Magistrate. However, they do not verify the identity of the person.

The difficulty of the Petitioner can be considered. The Petitioner may get the verification about the identification done before the Notary and also the Executive Magistrate. After getting verification done from both i.e. Notary as well as the Executive Magistrate, the papers be submitted to the defence, which the defence will consider and process the same, expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of

36 wp.5426.14.odt receipt of the verification.

Considering the fact that it is a case of family pension, the Respondents shall endeavour to get the procedure done, expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. [ N. W. SAMBRE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] ndm