Rupali Sachin Phule v. Sachin Dagadu Phule

989-CrRnAn-191-21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.191 OF 2021 WITH APPLN/1107/2022 IN REVN/191/2021 SACHIN DAGADU PHULE

VERSUS

RUPALI W/O. SACHIN PHULE ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sushant B. Choudhari Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Kalpana Sonpawale Kulkarni (Appointed Through Legal Aid) ...

CORAM :

S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE :

24-06-2022 PER COURT :- The learned counsel for the applicant tendered across the bar a copy of the compromise decree. The learned counsel for the applicant and respondent are agreeable that the parties have settled their dispute amicably, hence, they do not want to contest the present Revision. Leave granted to withdraw the petition. 2.

Whatsoever amount deposited by the applicant in this court be paid to the respondent, the petitioner has no objection for releasing the said amount to respondent.

989-CrRnAn-191-21.odt 3.

The Secretary, High Court Legal Services, Sub-Committee Aurangabad, do pay the fees to the learned Advocate Ms. Kalpana Sonpawale Kulkarni, who was appointed through the said committee.

4.

In above terms, the Revision stands dismissed as withdrawn. ( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE rrd