← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/7537/2022delay condonatedrejected

The Ex. Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Osmanabd Thr G.M.I.D.C., Aurangabad v. Hanumant Raghunath Bondhar And ORS

2022-12-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 962 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6898 OF 2022 IN FAST/9423/2020 THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, OSMANABDTHR G.M.I.D.C., AURANGABAD

VERSUS

SUMANBAI ANANDRAO KHANDARE AND ANR AND 963 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6912 OF 2022 IN FAST/9431/2020 WITH CA/6916/2022 IN FAST/9926/2020 WITH CA/6914/2022 IN FAST/9930/2020 THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, OSMANABDTHR G.M.I.D.C., AURANGABAD

VERSUS

SUBHASH ULHAS SURYAWANSHI THR G.PA. MAHESH AND ORS ...

AND 964 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6976 OF 2022 IN FAST/9084/2020 WITH CA/6978/2022 IN FAST/9213/2020 WITH CA/6980/2022 IN FAST/9218/2020 THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, OSMANABDTHR G.M.I.D.C., AURANGABAD

VERSUS

PRABHAKAR BHAGVAN PATOLE AND ORS AND 965 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7537 OF 2022 IN FAST/9427/2020 WITH CA/7535/2022 IN FAST/9921/2020 THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, OSMANABDTHR G.M.I.D.C., AURANGABAD

VERSUS

HANUMANT RAGHUNATH BONDHAR AND ORS

...

Mr.S.G. Bhalerao, advocate for the applicants. Mr.S.N. Kendre, Mr.A.B. Chate, Mr.P.M. Kulkarni & Mr.B.V. Virdhe, AGPs for respondent/State.

Mr. N.J. Patil, advocate for respondent no.1. ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 21st DECEMBER, 2022 PER COURT :- 1.

The appellant-acquiring body in all these applications are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned therein which appear to be caused due to obtaining sanctions at various stages.

2.

The learned counsel for the respondentsclaimants objected the applications on the ground that the amounts of the impugned awards are not deposited with this Court.

3.

However, the learned counsel for the acquiring body made statement that all such amounts of the impugned awards are already deposited in the concerned Reference Court on 22nd May, 2019 itself vide common cheque.

4.

In view of such statement, the delay periods in all these applications stand condoned.

5.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal offce objections, if any.

6.

The applications are disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE SGA