← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3984/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Uttam Venkatrao Patil And Others v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

2015-07-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3984 OF 2015 UTTAM VENKATRAO PATIL AND OTHERS

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Bhumkar R. P.

AGP for Respondents State: Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. M. S. Sonawane ...

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE :

24th July, 2015 PER COURT :

1.

Mr. Bhumkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are entitled for the time bound pay scale and the benefits as per letter dated 22.10.2013 issued by respondent No.2 so also the orders passed in Writ Petition Nos.1434/2009 and 4094/2010. 2.

We have heard Mr. Sonawane, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. Mr. Sonawane does not dispute the case of the petitioner is covered by Writ Petition No. 1434/2009 decided on 27th January, 2010.

3.

In the light of above, we follow the same course of action and pass similar order.

O R D E R

I.

The declinement of Respondent No.1 of petitioner's candidature as is expressed through the Affidavit-in-Reply is struck down as unjustified.

II. Respondent no.1 is directed to consider the case of the petitioner: (a) By ignoring the fact of :- 1/2

i.

retirement, and ii. lack of qualification of the petitioner.

(b) consider the case of the petitioner based on eligibility of the petitioner for relaxation of qualification on the basis that on the relevant date, the petitioner has already crossed 45 years of age. III. The petitioner be granted the benefit of scale of pay given to any one amongst the juniors to the petitioner to whom the benefit is given through the order dated 22nd October, 2013 [Annex.J to the petition], and should be given the all and same benefits as given to such junior candidate who is similarly placed, and was given the benefit only because he was in the employment on the date of passing of order or allotment of posts.

4.

Writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) JPC 2/2