Ashok Ambadas Mahale v. The New India Assurance Company Ltd. And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 930 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5828 OF 2012 IN FAST/9660/2012 ASHOK AMBADAS MAHALE

VERSUS

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Shri Madhav M. Bhokarikar Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Shri Patil h/f. Shri A.G.Kanade ...

CORAM : P.R. BORA, J.

Date: November 01, 2018 ...

PER COURT :- Heard Shri M.M.Bhokarikar, learned Counsel for the applicant and Shri Patil, learned Counsel holding for Shri A.G.Kanade, learned Counsel for respondent No.1. Respondent No.2, though served, has not caused appearance in the matter.

Though, respondent No.1 has opposed for condoning the delay, for the reasons stated in the application, which according to me are just and sufficient, delay of 330 days is condoned. Appeal be registered in accordance with law.

( P.R. BORA, J. ) ...

SPT