Suyog Urja Private Limited Through Its Authorized Officer Kumar Raghunath Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

{1} 913 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3317 OF 2023 SUYOG URJA PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTH ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Shailendra S Gangakhedkar AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar.

Advocate for respondent No.7 : Mr. P.P. More. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.

DATE : 13th APRIL, 2023 P.C.:- Counsel for petitioner submits that prayer clause (C) is rendered infructuous in view of the subsequent development of determination of compensation. He submits that the petitioner shall approach the respondent Nos. 3 to 6 seeking appropriate assistance in the matter of execution of the contract in question, in the wake of aforesaid orders of awarding compensation. In such an eventuality, the respondent Nos. 3 to 6 shall decide the prayer of the petitioner for extending appropriate protection in accordance with law, expeditiously. 2.

Writ petition stands disposed of.

[S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR] [NITIN W. SAMBRE] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-