← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/7513/2023delay condonatedrejected

Hanmant Rangnath Surwase And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Latur And ORS

2023-09-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

CA 6381/23 & Ors.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 64 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6381 OF 2023 IN FAST/596/2023 WITH CA/6391/2023 IN FAST/729/2023 WITH CA/6390/2023 IN FAST/732/2023 WITH CA/6382/2023 IN FAST/734/2023 WITH CA/6380/2023 IN FAST/738/2023 SAWDAGAR BAPURAO KESARE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. L.C. Patil AGP for Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr. N.T. Bhagat ...

66 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7456 OF 2023 IN FAST/7681/2023 WITH CA/7457/2023 IN FAST/7685/2023 WITH CA/7458/2023 IN FAST/7689/2023 WITH CA/7459/2023 IN FAST/7692/2023 WITH CA/7461/2023 IN FAST/7695/2023 WITH CA/7462/2023 IN FAST/7698/2023 WITH CA/7463/2023 IN FAST/7701/2023 CHANDRAKALABAI NIVRATI TAT

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, LATUR ANDORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. L.C. Patil AGP for Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr. B.V. Virdhe ...

67 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7512 OF 2023 IN FAST/9124/2023 WITH CA/7513/2023 IN FAST/9126/2023 WITH CA/7514/2023 IN FAST/9128/2023 WITH CA/7515/2023 IN FAST/9131/2023 BALIRAM MARUTI SARVADE DIED THR LRS RAMKISHAN BALIRAMSARVADE AND ORS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. L.C. Patil AGP for Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr. K.N. Lokhande ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATED : 25/09/2023 PER COURT :

CA 6381/23 & Ors.

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. Though notice is served on respondent No. 3 in the matters, none appeared for respondent No. 3.

2.

The first appeals are filed along with application for condonation of delay of 1877, 1937 and 1943 days in filing the respective appeals. The learned counsel for the applicants/claimants submits that the claimants are poor agriculturists and that their lands are compulsorily acquired and due to financial difficulties, they could not file appeals in time. The learned counsel further submits that the claimants would waive the interest for the delayed period caused in filing the first appeals. 3.

For the reasons stated in the applications, the aforesaid delay caused in filing the first appeals is condoned. The delay condonation applications are allowed, subject to condition that the claimants shall not be entitled for the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. 4.

First appeals are admitted.

5.

On admission, the respective learned AGPs waives service of notice for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in respective appeals. 6.

Call R. & P.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER J.] ssc/