Sachin Vaijnath Gudle v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(1) W.P. No. 4169 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Writ Petition No. 4169 of 2016 District : Latur Sachin s/o. Vaijnath Gudle, Age : 31 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Shambhu Umbarga, Taluka : Udgir, District : Latur.

.. Petitioner.

versus

1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.

2. The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Latur.

3. Mahadeo Shikshan Sanstha, Shambhu Umbarga, Taluka : Udgir, District : Latur, Through its Secretary.

4. Dasgir Vidyalaya, Shambhu Umbarga, Taluka : Udgir, District : Latur, Through its Headmaster.

.. Respondents.

............

Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, Addl. Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 and 2.

............

(2) W.P. No. 4169 of 2016 CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 12TH APRIL 2016 PER COURT :

Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Addl. Government Pleader appearing for respondent nos.1 and 2.

2.

We are not inclined to interfere in the impugned order.

However, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that respondent no.2 has directed to recover the amount in three instalments. He prays that respondent no.2 may be directed to recover the amount towards difference of honorarium in twelve monthly instalments.

3.

In the light of discussion herein above, though we are not inclined to interfere in the impugned order, we direct respondent no.2 to recover the amount towards difference of honorarium in twelve equal monthly instalments.

4.

With the above observations, the petition stands rejected.

(SANGITRAO S. PATIL) (S.S. SHINDE) JUDGE JUDGE puranik / WP4169.16