← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9263/2016admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Karan Manikrao Pudale v. Gram Panchayat,Murud, Through Its Village Development Officer And Others

2024-10-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More1 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:23154 1 922 9263-16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9263 OF 2016 IN SAST/9468/2015 KARAN MANIKRAO PUDALE

VERSUS

GRAM PANCHAYAT,MURUD, THROUGH ITS VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Dinesh Daud h/f Mr. Shinde Manoj D., Advocate for Applicant Mr. D. B. Bhange, AGP, for Respondent No.3-State ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 01/10/2024.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The application is filed for condonation of delay of 138 days in filing second appeal.

3.

It appears that respondent No.3-State is a formal party. Respondent Nos.1 & 2 despite service, remained absent. Considering the short period of delay and reasons mentioned in the application, the application stands allowed subject to cost of Rs.500/- to be paid to the Advocate's Bar Library, High Court, Aurangabad.

4.

Application is accordingly disposed of.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-