Raghunath Baburao Raut v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
1 CA - 3920-2019+Group
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3920 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8424 OF 2015 KAMLESH MOTILAL PRAJAPATI AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3921 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3922 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3959 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3960 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3961 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3962 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3963 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3964 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3965 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3966 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3967 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3968 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3969 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3970 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3971 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
3972 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3973 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3974 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3975 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3979 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3981 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3982 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3983 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3984 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4105 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4175 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3873 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3874 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3842 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4735 OF 2017 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3843 OF 2019 IN WP/8424/2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
11298 OF 2016 IN WP/8424/2015 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
2 CA - 3920-2019+Group ...
Advocate for applicants Mr. A.S. Barlota, Advocate (CA/3920/2019, CA/3922/2019, CA/3874/2019) Mr. Ashpak Patel, Advocate (CA/3921/2019, CA/4105/2019) Mr. Atul M. Karad, Advocate (CA/3959/2019, CA/3960/2019, CA/3961/2019, CA/3964/2019, CA/3965/2019, CA/3966/2019, CA/3967/2019, CA/3968/2019, CA/3969/2019, CA/3970/2019, CA/3971/2019, CA/3972/2019, CA/3973/2019, CA/3974/2019, CA/3975/2019, CA/3979/2019, CA/3981/2019, CA/3982/2019, CA/3983/2019, CA/3984/2019) Mr. D.P. Palodkar, Advocate (CA/3962/2019, CA/3963/2019, CA/4175/2019, CA/3842/2019, CA/11298/2016) Mr. Ameya N. Sabnis, Advocate (CA/3873/2019) Mr. S.S. Shete, Advocate (CA/4735/2017) Mr. Chaitanya S. Deshmukh, Advocate (CA/3843/2019) Mr. Milind M. Joshi, Advocate (CA/4423/2019) AGP for respondent-State Mr. S.S. Dande, AGP Advocate for petitioner Mr. A.S. Bayas, Advocate for petitioner in W.P. Advocate for respondents in W.P.
Mr. N.S. Tekale, Advocate for respondent no. 15 Mr. A.A. Jagatkar, Advocate for respondent no. 4 Mr. A.S. Barlota, Advocate for respondents no. 6, 8, 10 and 11 Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate for respondents no. 5, 7 and 9 ...
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATE : 22-04-2019
3 CA - 3920-2019+Group ORDER :
1.
Learned counsel for appearing parties are ad-idem that order dated 25-02-2019 passed in writ petition no. 8424 of 2015 had been taken to supreme court under Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No(s). 9940/2019 and the same has been disposed of on 05-04-2019, observing thus, " Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
Permission to file the Special Leave Petition is granted. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks the permission of the Court to withdraw the Special Leave Petition, on instructions, since in the meantime, orders have been passed by the competent authority in respect of which the petitioners seek to pursue their remedies in accordance with law.
The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. " 2.
Having regard to aforesaid, no separate approach in respect of applicants would be required or would be proper. Present civil applications, in view of aforesaid are disposed of accordingly.
[R. G. AVACHAT] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE JUDGE arp/