← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/4869/2023disposed off

Manoj Suresh Udmale v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Chief Secretary And Others

2023-07-14Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade2 pages

901-CA-4869-2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4869 OF 2023 IN REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO. 9250 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6882 OF 2019 MANOJ SURESH UDMALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ....

Mr. A. S. Shelke, Advocate for applicant Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for the State Mr. Sanket S. Jangale, Advocates h/f Mr. Rahul R. Karpe, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 and 4 Mr. P. S. Dighe, Advocate for respondent No.5 ....

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE:14.07.2023 PER COURT :- 1.

Learned Advocate Mr. Dighe submits that he has instructions to appear for respondent No.5. He is tendering the Vakalatnama. Learned Advocate Mr. Jangale, holding for learned Advocate Mr. Rahul R. Karpe, submits that they have instructions to appear for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Vakalatnama to be filed within a period of two weeks.

(( 2 )) 901-CA-4869-2023 2.

Though both the learned Advocates are strongly opposing the application, taking into consideration the duration of the delay i.e. 125 days and the reason that on account of lack of knowledge about staff approval orders dated 21.11.2018 and 05.05.2022, it is stated that he approached late for the review. We take that it is a good ground to condone the delay. Hence, the Civil Application stands allowed and disposed of.

3.

Registry to verify and register the review application. 4.

As regards review application is concerned, if advised, respondent Nos. 3 to 5 may file affidavit-in-reply on or before 27.07.2023 by giving a copy of the same to the other side in advance. We clarify that this opportunity will not be given to them, later on. 5.

Stand over to 28.07.2023.

[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ] SMS