The State Of Maharashtra And ANR v. Tatya Shivram Darekar And ORS

2024:BHC-AUG:10767 ca5807-16.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5807 OF 2016 IN FAST/9564/2016 The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....Applicants

VERSUS

Rajaram Devidas Todkari And Anr .....Respondent AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5809 OF 2016 IN FAST/9568/2016 The State Of Maharashtra And Anr .....Applicants

VERSUS

Tatya Shivram Darekar And Ors .....Respondents .....

Mr. V. S. Badakh, AGP for applicants - State Ms. Laxmi Thakur h/f Mr. L. C. Patil, Advocate for Respondents .....

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 14 th JUNE, 2024 ORDER :

1.

Heard.

2.

For the reasons stated in the applications and since respondents have no objection, delay is condoned. Civil applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause "B". 3.

Appeals be registered.

[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE drp/ca5807-16.doc