Mahadeo Pralhad Barkul And ORS v. Shivaji Vithoba Bawale And ORS

ca8334.12 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8334 OF 2012 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO.9833 OF 2012 Mahadeo Pralhad Barkul and Others APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Shivaji Vithoba Bawale and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. S. A. Ambad, Advocate for the applicants Mr. P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.1 .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 18 th NOVEMBER, 2016 ORDER :

1.

Learned advocate for the applicants points out that delay is sought to be accounted for under the reasons as are appearing in civil application.

2.

Learned advocate for the respondent is not in a position to dispute veracity of the reasons. In the facts and circumstances, it would be expedient to condone the delay occurred in filing second appeal.

3.

In view of aforesaid, civil application stands granted in terms of prayer clause "B" and is disposed of. [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/ca8334.12