Harshad Sureshrao Deshmukh v. Pruthva Harshad Deshmukh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7098 OF 2018 (Harshad s/o Sureshrao Deshmukh Vs. Pruthva Harshad Deshmukh) IN REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO.9526 OF 2018 IN MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.94 OF 2017 Mr.S.J.Salunke, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr.P.A.Bhosle, Advocate for the respondent.

( CORAM : Ravindra V.Ghuge, J.) DATE : 31/08/2018 PER COURT :

1.

For the reasons set out in the application, the civil application is allowed. The delay is condoned. The review application is heard by the consent of the parties.

2.

Considering the consensus between the submissions of the learned Advocates, the review application is disposed of with the following directions :- [a] The review applicant / husband shall clear of all the arrears of the travelling allowance on or before 29/09/2018. [b] The wife is permitted to withdraw the said amount as she claims that she has undertaken 42 visits to the Pune Court from her residence at Ambad.

khs/AUGUST 2018/ -d

[c] The Family Court, Pune would decide P.A. No.267/2017 as expeditiously as possible and by considering the long journey undertaken by the wife for attending the said proceedings and by ensuring that the dates of hearing are not too close which would increase the rigours of litigation for the wife.

d] The litigating sides agree to render complete cooperation to the Family Court and avoid seeking adjournments on trivial and unreasonable grounds.

[e] The Trial Court would conclude the said proceedings on or before 28/02/2019, notwithstanding the fact that if the litigating sides wholeheartedly co-operate, the Family Court may even decide the said proceedings earlier than the limit prescribed.

( Ravindra V.Ghuge, J.) Kranti Hansraj Shekatkar by Kranti Hansraj Shekatkar Date: 2018.09.03 10:47:33 +0530 khs/AUGUST 2018/ -d