Taherabegum Shaikh Ahmed v. Digambar Ramji Shinde And Another

922-ca-4311-2015.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4311 OF 2015 IN SAST/9584/2015 TAHERABEGUM SHAIKH AHMED

VERSUS

DIGAMBAR RAMJI SHINDE AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Pathan Hamzakhan I. Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 : Mr. Kadam Gajanan G. ...

CORAM

:SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE : 10.08.2021 ORDER :- .

Present application has been filed for getting the delay of 264 days condoned in filing second appeal.

2.

Heard learned Advocate Mr. H. I. Pathan for the applicant and learned Advocate Mr. G. G. Kadam for respondent Nos.1 and 2. 3.

Learned Advocate for the applicant has made submissions in support of the application.

4.

Learned Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 strongly opposed the application and submitted that no proper much less sufficient reasons have been assigned to condone the delay. (1)

922-ca-4311-2015.odt 5.

It is to be noted that the applicant is 54 years old lady suffering from various ailments, therefore, taking a lenient view and also taking into consideration the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay stands condoned.

6.

Application stands allowed and disposed of accordingly. 7.

Registry to verify and register the second appeal. [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.] scm (2)