Pathan Parveen Sultana D/O. Subhan Khan v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
418.21crwp (1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.418 OF 2021 PATHAN PARVEEN SULTANA D/O. SUBHAN KHAN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Mr Saeed S. Shaikh, Advocate for petitioner;
Mr R. B. Bagul, A.P.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 4 & 6 CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ.
DATE : 22nd April, 2021 PER COURT:
1.
We have heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner, who claims to be a former employee of the Al-Madani Urdu Primary School, Harsool, Aurangabad.
2.
She has raised her grievance about seven bogus appointments as teachers, set out at page 83 of the petition, which is a communication by the Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, thereby granting approval. The said communication is addressed to the chair person of the Rashtravadi Sport and Education Society, Aurangabad, which operates the said school. This fact came to the knowledge of the petitioner when the information officer of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, issued a communication dated 22/07/2020 in response to the application dated 09/03/2020, filed by the Law and
418.21crwp (2) Rights Council of India, which is a registered society. Based on the said information, the petitioner has preferred a specific complaint on 03/08/2020 to the Harsool Police Station, seeking registration of first information report under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
3.
At the outset, we are of the view that any issue as regards illegal appointments of teachers, would be within the realm of the Education Department and the petitioner ought to approach the appropriate authorities of the Education Department to point out such alleged illegal appointments.
4.
This petition, is being disposed off with a direction to the SHO of the Harsool Police Station, Aurangabad to consider the said complaint dated 03/08/2020, in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Thereafter, if the petitioner has any grievance, she would be at liberty to avail of a remedy, as may be permissible in law.
(B. U. DEBADWAR, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) sjk