Shaikh Zafar Shaikh Abrahim v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3808 OF 2015.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders Mr.S.S.Kazi, advocate for the petitioner Mr.S.S.Tope, Addl. Govt. Pleader for the State. Mr.S.V.Dixit, advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & V.K.JADHAV,JJ.

Date : 21.07.2015.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

Mr.Kazi, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the letter dated 20.3.2015, issued by the Chief Executive Officer, suspending the petitioner is illegal and without authority. The Board has not been consulted and without concurrence of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer could not have issued the order of suspension.

3.

Mr.Dixit, learned counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 submits that in fact, the relief claimed does not survive as the petitioner after filing of this Writ Petition has attained the age of superannuation and the order of suspension would not operate after

the retirement.

4.

In light of the said statement, Writ Petition stands disposed of. In case the petitioner has any grievance with regard to any inquiry, the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate steps. (V.K.JADHAV,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.21.07.2015.

asp/office/wp3808.15