← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/1720/2015disposed off

Shakuntalabai Dnyanoba Ghadge v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2015-07-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande2 pages

1 Cr.Apln. 1720.2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1720 OF 2015 Shakuntalabai Dnyanoba Ghadge .... APPLICANT V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... RESPONDENTS .............................

Mr. P.K.Iprar h/f Mr. S.J.Salunke, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. S.G.Chincholkar, A.P.P. for R.No.1 - State. ..............................

CORAM : V.M.DESHPANDE, J.

DATE : 3rd JULY, 2015 .............................

PER COURT :

1.

Heard Mr. P.K.Iprar holding for Mr. S.J.Salunke, learned counsel for the applicant.

2.

This is an application u/s 439 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted in favour of respondent Nos. 2 to 4 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedpur in Criminal M.A. (Bail) No. 14/2015 dated 07/03/2015. Learned Judge of the Court below granted anticipatory bail in favour of respondent Nos. 2

2 Cr.Apln. 1720.2015 to 4 for the offences punishable u/s 498-A,306 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 19/2015. 3.

Present applicants are husband and in-laws of deceased. Learned Additional Sessions Judge has evaluated the prosecution case vis-a-vis each of the respondent and in my view has correctly come to the conclusion that prima facie case is made out for anticipatory bail. While granting anticipatory bail, respondents were put to certain conditions. 4.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the anticipatory bail granted in favour of respondent Nos. 2 to 4 is required to be cancelled because the offence is very serious. The discretion exercised by the learned Court below is just and proper.

5.

Hence, present Criminal Application is dismissed. [V.M.DESHPANDE, J.] KNP/Cr.Apln. 1720.2015