← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9277/2010admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Rupali Alias Anita Venkat More v. Venkati Raosaheb More

2017-02-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh1 pages

CA-9277.10.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9277 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL [STAMP] NO. 10244 OF 2010 Rupali @ Anita w/o Venkati More .. Applicant versus Venkati s/o Raosaheb More .. Respondent ---- Mr. S. R. Bagal, Advocate for applicant Mr. M. V. Ghatge, Advocate for respondent CORAM :

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE :

24th February, 2017 ORDER :

1.

This is an application for condonation of delay in filing second appeal.

2.

Though learned counsel for respondent purports to resist, he is not able to challenge veracity of the contents of the application. In the circumstances, it would be expedient to condone delay for reasons given in the application.

3.

Civil application, as such, stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and is disposed of.

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JUDGE pnd