Vishwas Pandit Kulkarni v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11382 OF 2015 IN FAST/9848/2015 WITH CA/11383/2015 IN FAST/9854/2015 WITH CA/11384/2015 IN FAST/9858/2015 WITH CA/11386/2015 IN FAST/9762/2015 WITH CA/11387/2015 IN FAST/9880/2015 WITH CA/11388/2015 IN FAST/9878/2015 WITH CA/11397/2015 IN FAST/9869/2015 WITH CA/11398/2015 IN FAST/9873/2015 WITH CA/11399/2015 IN FAST/9875/2015 WITH CA/11400/2015 IN FAST/9866/2015 SHRIMANT DHONDIRAM TAMBE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Undre Vikram S Mr. CV Dharurkar, AGP for Respondents: 1;

Mr. Jeevan J.Patil, Adv. h/for Mr. GB Rajale, Adv. for Resp. No.2 ...

CORAM : P.R. BORA, J.

Dated: April 16, 2016 ...

PER COURT :- 1) Heard. In all these matters, delay caused is of the period ranging from 1010 to 1719 days. The learned Counsel appearing for the acquiring body has not seriously opposed for condoning the delay. The learned Counsel only submitted that the appellants/claimants be disentitled from claiming any interest of the period of delay in question. BDV

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2) The learned Counsel for the applicants/appellants brought to my notice that in similar matters, this Court has condoned the delay and all such matters are pending for admission.

3) In view of the above, the delay caused in filing these appeals is condoned. CAs stand disposed of.

4) The appeals be registered in accordance with law.

5) It is clarified that in the event the appeals are allowed and the amount of compensation is enhanced, the appellants/claimants will not be entitled for the interest for the period of delay. CAs stand disposed of.

( P.R. BORA, J. ) ...

BDV