Balu @ Mahadeo Sudhakar Phapal v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

31-BA-531-23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO.531 OF 2023 AKSHAY ARJUN PHAPAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 542 OF 2023 BALU @ MAHADEO SUDHAKAR PHAPAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S. J. Salunke APP for Respondent No.1: Mr. K. S. Patil Advocate for respondent No.2 : Mr. N.R. Shaikh .... (appointed Through Legal Aid) CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE : 10.04.2023 PER COURT :

1.

After hearing the learned counsel for the applicants and learned APP for the State, the Court expressed disinclination to grant bail. Learned counsel for the applicants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application. 2.

Leave granted.

3.

Both applications stand dismissed as withdrawn.

31-BA-531-23.odt

4. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad do pay the fees to the counsel appointed for respondent No.2 as per schedule.

( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE ysk