← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/464/2020disposed off

Navnath S/O. Dhondiram Vetal v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2021-09-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh,Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi2 pages

1 69 wp 464-20 s

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 69 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.464 OF 2020 WITH APPLN/862/2020 NAVNATH S/O. DHONDIRAM VETAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S. S. Panale APP for Respondent no.1-State : Mr. A. S. Shinde Advocate for Respondent no.2 : Mr. S. S. Kulkarni ...

CORAM: SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & N. B. SURYAWANSHI, JJ.

DATED:

6th SEPTEMBER, 2021.

P.C. :

This writ petition is fled seeking quashing of the FIR at C. R. No. 54 of 2020, for the ofences punishable under Sections 323, 498-A, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC and under Section 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, registered with Pundlik Nagar Police Station, Aurangabad lodged at the instance of respondent no.2. After completion of investigation, charge sheet is fled and case is numbered as RCC No.362 of 2020, which is pending in the court of 12th Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Aurangabad. 2.

In the FIR, respondent no.2 has arrayed total nine persons as accused including husband, mother-in-law, sister-in-law of the sister-in-law, sister of mother -in-law, her husband, brothers of the

2 69 wp 464-20 s mother-in-law and the present petitioner who is husband's cousin. Omnibus allegations are made that all the accused persons used to harass the frst informant on account of bringing money for her maternal home for construction of the house. They used to illtreate her by insulting her and abusing her and by assaulting her by slapping.

3.

Admittedly, the petitioner does not stay along with the family of the frst informant and he stays separately. It appears from the record that only with a view to harass the petitioner and in-laws, distinct relatives are implicated in the present ofence. There is no specifc role attributed to the petitioner. 4.

Taking into consideration the material placed on record, we are convinced that continuation of the proceedings against the petitioner is an abuse of process of law. We therefore quash the proceedings of RCC No. 362 of 2020 to the extent of petitioner, which is pending in the court of 12th Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Aurangabad.

5.

Writ petition is allowed in above terms.

(N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) ( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. ) vsm/