← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3993/2019disposed offdismissed for default

M/S Raj Construction Kaij Through Its Authorised Representative Shaikh Altaf v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2020-02-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 25 WRIT PETITION NO.3993 OF 2019 M/S RAJ CONSTRUCTION KAIJ THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE SHAIKH ALTAF

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Girish K. Thigale(Naik) AGP for Respondents State : Mrs V. S. Choudhary Advocate for Respondent No. 6 : Mr. S.R. Shirsath

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE :

5th February, 2020 ORDER:

1.

The reply is fled by respondents contending that majority of the work is completed. Mr. Thigale, learned counsel submits that in view of the reply fled, the relief claimed in the present petition may not be effective. The petitioner may fle suit for declaration and damages. 2.

Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. The petitioner may fle proceedings as may be permissible in law. In that event all contentions of the parties are kept open.

(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) JPC