← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5008/2018disposed off

Girdhar Kisanrao Aasne And Others v. The Collector, Ahmednagar And Others

2024-08-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade3 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:18352-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 958 WRIT PETITION NO. 5818 OF 2020 JAYDEEP GIRIDHAR AASNE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5008 OF 2018 GIRDHAR KISANRAO AASNE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE COLLECTOR, AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4778 OF 2021 IN WP/5818/2020 VISHWANATH RAMCHANDRA WAGH AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7943 OF 2024 IN WP/5818/2020 DR. SHANKARRAO VASANTRAO MUTHE

VERSUS

JAYDEEP GIRIDHAR AASNE AND OTHERS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10711 OF 2021 IN WP/5818/2020 NITIN GORAKHNATH YENGE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11128 OF 2019 IN WP/5008/2018 GIRDHAR KISANRAO AASNE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE COLLECTOR AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11129 OF 2019 IN WP/5008/2018 GIRDHAR KISANRAO AASNE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE COLLECTOR AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS ...

Mr. A. B. Kale a/w Ms. S. A. Kale, Mr. Sanket Kulkarni, Advocates for the Petitioners in respective Petitions Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for the Respondents -State Mr. V. D. Hon, Senior Advocate i/by Mr. A. V. Hon, Advocate for the Intervenor Mr. R. N. Patil h/for Mr. S. S. Thombre, Advocate for Respondent No.5 in WP No.5008/2020 & Respondent no.4 in WP No.5818/2020

CORAM

: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 14th August, 2024 ORDER:

1.

By consent of the parties, all the Civil Applications, seeking intervention ,are allowed.

2.

The learned AGP places on record a copy of the communication dated 12.08.2024, addressed by the Under Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest, Government of Maharashtra, informing the learned AGP that an amendment has been proposed to the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. The said communication is marked as 'X' for identification.

3.

The learned Advocates for the Petitioners submit that these Petitions may be disposed off in view of the statement 'X', with a request that the amendment may be carried out at the earliest. 4.

In view of the above, these Writ Petitions are disposed off, on instructions. The proposed amendment may be introduced within a period of 60 days. If the Model Code of Conduct is introduced, we direct that it would not be an impediment for completing the procedure with regard to the amendment.

( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) JPChavan