Narayan Dagadu Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7011 OF 2021 IN FAST/10371/2021 WITH CA/7014/2021 IN FAST/10375/2021 WITH CA/7015/2021 IN FAST/10158/2021 WITH CA/7010/2021 IN FAST/10380/2021 WITH CA/7017/2021 IN FAST/10373/2021 WITH CA/7012/2021 IN FAST/10382/2021 WITH CA/7016/2021 IN FAST/10369/2021 WITH CA/7013/2021 IN FAST/10377/2021 NANURAM SONU DUBE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Kale Ajeet B.

AGP for Respondent/s - State : Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Ms. Manjusha Jagtap, Mr.

V.

V.

Tarde ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 19.10.2022 PER COURT :

The learned counsel Ms. Manjusha Jagtap for Acquiring Body in some of the Civil Applications wherein notices to the Acquiring Body are not issued, waives service.

2.

Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants in all these applications are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned in these applications. The delay appears to be caused due to their

financial crisis.

The learned AGP as well as the learned counsel for the Acquiring Body strongly opposed the applications on the ground that the delay is not properly explained.

3.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay periods as mentioned in these applications are condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the said delay periods.

4.

Appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The applications are disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-