Suresh Punjaba Ghuge v. Bajaj Auto Limited Aurangabad Thr Asst. Manager Personnel Legal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3617 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1493 OF 2012 (Suresh Punjaba Ghuge Vs. Bajaj Auto Limited, Aurangabad) ---- Mr. Sanjay D. Ghayal, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S.V. Dankh, Advocate for the respondent ---- CORAM :

SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 13th January, 2017 PER COURT :

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned counsel for the respondent (original petitioner) submits that the amount deposited by the respondent may be allowed to be withdrawn by the applicant, subject to his furnishing solvent surety. 3.

For the reasons stated in the civil application, it is allowed. The amount deposited by the respondent in this Court be paid to the applicant (original respondent) on his furnishing solvent surety of the like amount.

4.

The Civil Application is disposed of in the above terms.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL] JUDGE npj/ca3617-2014