Sunil Rama Shelke v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp st 9714.20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 9714 OF 2020 Jaya D/o Dhondiba Konkewar .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Sunil M. Vibhute, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri A. S. Shinde, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. WITH WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 9715 OF 2020 Ram S/o Venkatrao Ulgulwad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Sunil M. Vibhute, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. G. Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. WITH WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 9716 OF 2020 Shamal D/o Bapurao Jamdar .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Sunil M. Vibhute, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri K. D. Mundhe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. WITH WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 9718 OF 2020 Anuradha D/o Sayanna Kotpet .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Sunil M. Vibhute, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. K. Tambe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

2 wp st 9714.20 WITH WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 10042 OF 2020 Sunil S/o Rama Shelke .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Sunil M. Vibhute, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri A. S. Shinde, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. WITH WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 10043 OF 2020 Baliram S/o Shriram Nirde .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Sunil M. Vibhute, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. G. Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. WITH WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 9717 OF 2020 Sanjay S/o Rangnath Rathod .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Sunil M. Vibhute, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. V. S. Chaudhari, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.

DATE :

19TH JUNE, 2020.

ORDER :

.

Heard the learned counsel for petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleaders for respondents in respective writ petitions.

3 wp st 9714.20 2.

The petitioners have been placed on supernumerary posts. The orders placing the petitioners on supernumerary posts are issued without notice to the petitioners and without hearing the petitioners. The same is violative of principles of natural justice. 3.

In the light of the above, the impugned orders are quashed and set aside. The respondents shall not take any further action pursuant to the impugned orders, without issuing notice to the petitioners and without hearing the petitioners. 4.

In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

5.

The Scrutiny Committee may endeavour to decide the validation proceedings expeditiously.

[R. G. AVACHAT, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/June20