← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/6644/2023delay condonatedrejected

Minakshi Subhash Mhaismale And ORS v. Vijay Bapurao Bhongle And ORS

2023-10-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 36 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6644 OF 2023 IN FAST/9714/2023 MINAKSHI SUBHASH MHAISMALE AND ORS

VERSUS

VIJAY BAPURAO BHONGLE AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. D.S. Pagare, V.d. Pagare And R.O. Awasarmol ...

CORAM :

ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE :

23/10/2023 PER COURT :

1.

The present appeal is filed for enhancement of compensation amount along with an application for condonation of delay. The appeal is filed by the claimant widow and two minor children. The learned Advocate for the appellants/applicants submits that after the demise of the husband of the appellant she could not file appeal within a period of limitation as she was facing financial difficulties and delay caused in filing the appeal is not intentional.

2.

In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay, the delay is condoned. The application is disposed of.

3.

The appeal is admitted.

( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) vj gawade/-.