Junaid Ahmedkhan Manzoor Ahmedkhan v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4495 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9609 OF 2014 (Junaid Ahmedkhan Manzoor Ahmedkhan Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors.) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders Mrs. A.N. Ansari, Advocate for applicant Shri S.G. Sangle, A.G.P. for State Shri A.B. Tele, Advocate for respondent No.2 Shri D.P. Bakshi, Advocate for respondent No.4 .....

CORAM :

S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATED :

17th April, 2015.

1.

Mrs. Ansari, learned counsel for the applicant submits that, by way of amendment, the applicant seeks to aver regarding the protection of service as per the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court. Mr. Bakshi, learned counsel for the respondent No.4 employer opposes the Civil Application.

2.

Even otherwise, the non-applicants can controvert the averments sought to be introduced by way of amendment in the Writ Petition. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Necessary amendment to be carried out within 14 days.

(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)

fmp/ca4495.15