Umesh Mohan Kumawat v. V Giriraj And Others

{1} cp601-17.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.601 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5407 OF 2015 Umesh Mohan Kumawat PETITIONER

VERSUS

V. Giriraj and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. R. R. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. R. D. Biradar h/f Mr. S. T. Shelke, Advocate for Respondent No.5 .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.] DATE : 14 th NOVEMBER, 2025 ORDER :

1.

By giving appointment order to the Petitioner on 20th March, 2016, pursuant to the directions of this Court, the Respondents have complied with the orders.

2.

Learned Advocate for the Petitioner contends that in terms of the consequential benefits, the Petitioner should have been given deemed date of appointment, at an earlier point of time. This argument is misconceived and cannot be accepted in the facts of the of the present case.

{2} cp601-17.doc 3.

In view of compliance of the directions, the Contempt Petition is disposed of.

[ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/cp601-17.doc