← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/1386/2024disposed off

Rohit Ranjeet Daga v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025-10-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:28232-DB {1} 934 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1386 OF 2024 Rohit Ranjeet Daga ....Applicant

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Another .....Respondent .....

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ghule Aniruddha B. And Kothari Shweta S. APP for Respondent No.1: Mr. N.S. Tekale.

Advocate for Respondent No.2: Mr. Mr. D.S. Kale. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND MEHROZ K. PATHAN, JJ.

DATE : 7th OCTOBER, 2025.

P.C. :- 1.

During pendency of this application, settlement occurred between the applicants and respondent No.2 wife. The said Settlement Deed was referred to the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court for verification of contents through parties. As per the report of the learned Registrar (Judicial) dated 26.9.2025, it is informed that the applicants and respondent No.2 have voluntarily entered into aforesaid Settlement Deed, which is now marked as "X" for identification. 2.

On going through the Terms of Settlement,it appears that marriage between the applicant NO.1 and respondent No.2 has already been dissolved under the decree dated 31.7.2024 in HMP No. F-12/2024 passed by the learned Family Court, Jalna. Further, it appears that respondent No.2 has also received an amount of Rs. 27 Lakhs towards full and final settlement of dispute between the parties. Respondent No.2 wife has also waived all present and future claims in respect of the

{2} 934 sr.no..odt monetary benefits arising out of the said wedlock. She has also submitted "No objection" for quashing the present FIR and criminal proceeding arising therefrom. Care in respect of custody of minor child is also taken by keeping the custody of minor daughter with respondent No.2 wife with visitation rights to the applicant No.1, as per the decree of the Family Court, Jalna.

3.

In view of said settlement, continuation of present criminal proceedings against the applicant would be an abuse of process of law. Therefore, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B). The FIR in connection with Crime No 737 of 2020 registered with Sadar Bazar Police Station Jalna for the offence punishable under Section 498A, 323, 504 r/w. 34 of IPC alongwith the criminal proceeding arising out of the same, bearing RCC No. 348 of 2021 presently pending in the court of JMFc, Jalna stands quashed and set aside. 4.

The application accordingly stands disposed of. [MEHROZ K. PATHAN] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE.

grt/-