Pratap Shridharrao Shinde And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

11270.21CA+.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 919 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11270 OF 2021 IN FAST/10181/2021 WITH CA/11272/2021 IN FAST/ 10467/2021 WITH CA/11271/2021 IN FAST/10469/2021 VENKAT TATYARAO SHINDE AND ORS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Mr.N.D. Kendre, advocate for the applicants.

Mr.A.B. Chate, AGP for the respondent/State Mr.Shirish G. Sangle, advocate for respondent no.2. ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 21st DECEMBER, 2022 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants in all these applications are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned therein. The delay appears to be caused due to their fnancial crisis.

3.

The learned counsel for the acquiring body and learned AGP strongly opposed the applications on the ground that delay is not properly explained.

4.

However considering the statutory right of the applicants, the aforesaid delay periods stand condoned

11270.21CA+.odt subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid periods of delay. 5.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

6.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE SGA