City And Industrial Development Corporation, Thr Its Authorized Officer, Aurangabad v. Laxman Khusahl Suryawanshi Thr His Gpa Sanjay Kalantri (Deceased) Thr Lrs Nandlal And ORS

( 1 ) ca6494.20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 19 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6494 OF 2020 CITY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THR ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, AURANGABAD VS LAXMAN KHUSAHL SURYAWANSHI THR HIS GPA SANJAY KALANTRI (DECEASED) THR LRS NANDLAL AND ORES Mr. R. S. Wani, Advocate h/f Mr. A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S. W. Munde, AGP for the respondent/State CORAM :

V. L. ACHLIYA, J.

DATE :

07-12-2020 P. C.

.

The applicant has filed this application seeking condonation of 51 days delay in filing of appeal. 2.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGP for the respondent/State. Respondent No. 1-a to 1-C though served, are absent.

3.

In brief, it is the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant that 51 days delay in filing of appeal was not intentional and deliberate. It is submitted that the appellant has good case to succeed in appeal. In case, delay is not condoned serious prejudice may cause to the appellant.

( 2 ) ca6494.20 4.

On due consideration of the submissions advanced in the light of unchallenged and uncontroverted pleadings made in the application assigning cause for condonation of delay, I am of the view that delay deserves to be condoned. In case, delay is not condoned, there is every likelihood that a meritorious matter may be rejected for technical reasons. Hence, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause-B.

5.

Appeal be registered.

6.

List the appeal after eight weeks.

7.

The application is disposed of in above terms. [ V. L. ACHLIYA, J. ] VishalK/ca6494.20