Officer In-Charge Office Of M.I.D.C., Aurangabad And ANR v. Nanasaheb Bhaurao Matsagar And Othersors
9096.22CA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 23 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9096 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.974 OF 2021 OFFICER IN-CHARGE OFFICE OF M.I.D.C., AURANGABAD & ANOTHER
VERSUS
NANASAHEB BHAURAO MATSAGAR AND OTHERS ...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr.S.S.Dande AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.N.T.Bhagat Advocate for Respondent no.1 : Ms.Sakshi A. Kale h/f. Mr.A.M.Hajare ...
CORAM : S.G.DIGE, J.
DATE : 27.06.2022 P.C. :
1] Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the respondents.
2] The learned counsel for the applicants submits that respondent no.1 Nanasaheb Bhaurao Matsagar is died during pendency of this Appeal, hence, his heirs and legal representatives be taken on record.
3] Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicants as well as the reasons mentioned
9096.22CA in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause-B.
4] Accordingly, Civil Application is disposed of. 5] The appellant to take steps within two weeks from today.
[S.G.DIGE] JUDGE DDC