Vijay Mahadeo Mirajkar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:8186-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8749 OF 2018 Vijay s/o Mahadeo Mirajkar ... PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Others ... RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. A.M. Gaikwad, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. R.K. Ingole, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1 Mr. A.K. Muley, Advocate for Respondent No.4 .......

CORAM:

ALOK ARADHE, CJ. & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATE:

19th MARCH, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that, during the pendency of the Petition, the Petitioner has expired and subsequently the lease agreement is also executed. Therefore, the Writ Petition is rendered infructuous. 2.

In view of the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) FMPathan/-