Namdeo Linouram Nukulwad v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Collector, Nanded And ORS

2025:BHC-AUG:6746 (1) 930 CA- 2265-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 930 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2265 OF 2022 IN FAST/10233/2020 NAMDEO LINOURAM NUKULWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, NANDED AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Adv. Laxmi R. Thakur h/f Mr. L. C. Patil AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. D. J. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Sunil V. Warad ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : MARCH 07, 2025 ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant/claimant is seeking condonation of delay of 1967 days in filing the appeal, which appears to be caused due to his poor financial condition.

3.

The learned counsel for the respondent/Acquiring Body strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained and it is inordinate. 4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay of 1967 days in this application stands

(2) 930 CA- 2265-22.odt condoned subject to cost of Rs. 2500/- (Rs. Two Thousand Five Hundred) to be deposited with the Registry of this Court for utilization of High Court Dispensary within two weeks and also subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest and statutory benefits for the period of aforesaid delay. 5.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any, and deposit of cost.

6.

The application is accordingly disposed of .

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) Y.S. Kulkarni