Rajani Chandrakant Bharule v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11336 OF 2009 IN WP/3228/2007 RAJANI CHANDRAKANT BHARULE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

---- Mrs.Kalpalata Patil-Bharaswadkar, Advocate for applicant Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondent ---- CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : DECEMBER 05, 2017 PER COURT Heard Mrs.Bharaswadkar-Patil, learned Counsel for applicant and the learned AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. 2.

Learned Counsel for applicant refers to the reasons mentioned in paragraph 2 of the Civil Application. Though learned APP purports to resist the application, she is not in a position to overcome the veracity of applicant's submissions.

3.

In the circumstances, we condone the delay caused in filing the Review Application. The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] kbp