Tukaram @ Sakha Dnyandev Ghule v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH

AT AURANGABAD 25 BAIL APPLICATION NO.563 OF 2023 TUKARAM @ SAKHA DNYANDEV GHULE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. D.S. Ingole h/f Mr. Ghanekar N.S. APP for Respondent-State : Ms. V. N.Patil-Jadhav. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. R. N. BharaswadkarAppointed. ...

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE : 17.07.2023 PER COURT :- 1.

Learned counsel for the applicant states that he tried to contact the applicant, but he could not. The client has already intimated him that he wanted to engage another lawyer. 2.

In view of the above statement, it seems that the applicant is not interested to prosecute the matter. Therefore, appearance of the learned counsel for the applicant is discharged and bail application stands dismissed as the applicant is not interested to prosecute the matter.

3.

The Secretary, High Court Legal Services, SubCommittee, Aurangabad do pay the legal charges to learned counsel appointed for respondent No.2 as per the schedule. (S. G. MEHARE, J.) ...

vmk/-