← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/4565/2024rejected at admission stage

Jagannath Kautik Saidane (Through Gpa) Kapil Vinayak Saindane v. The State Of Maharashtra Special Land Acquisition Officer-2, Upper Tapi Project, Hatnur, Jalgaon

2024-05-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:9654 ..1..

928-ca-4565-24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4565 OF 2024 IN FA/3254/2016 JAGANNATH KAUTIK SAIDANE (THROUGH GPA) KAPIL VINAYAK SAINDANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-2, UPPER TAPI PROJECT, HATNUR, ...

Advocate for Applicant : Ms.Vaishali B. Suryawanshi AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. D. B. Bhange Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Subhash Chillarge ...

CORAM

: Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.

DATE : 03.05.2024 PER COURT :

1.

Heard Ms. Suryawanshi, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. Bhange, learned AGP appearing for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. Subhash Chillarge appearing for Respondent No.3. 2.

By the present application, the applicant set out prayer clause 'B' and 'C' as under :

B) The hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 to verify the General Power of Attorney given by him before this Hon'ble court in order to proceed the F.A. 3254/2016 and 1125/2017.

C) By allowing the Civil Application, may kindly direct

..2..

928-ca-4565-24 the respondent no.4 to withdraw the amount and thereafter deposit the same on the account of GPA holder as per the clauses of General Power of Attorney and as per the clause in the mutual agreement between the applicants father and the Respondent no.4."

3.

Since the claimant Jagannath Kautik Saindane refused to verify the General Power of Attorney given to his Power of Attorney holder, this Court cannot decide said dispute.

4.

Hence, application is rejected.

(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) shp