Sachin Pandurang Ghortale v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 Cri.A.2163.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2163 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL STAMP NO. 232 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL STAMP NO. 232 OF 2014 Sachin Pandurang Ghortale ...Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

.....

Mr. P.S. Koshti, Advocate for Applicant Mr. B.L. Dhas, A.P.P. for respondent .....

CORAM : A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.

DATED : 9th MARCH, 2015 Order :- 1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

2.

Issue notice to respondent.

3.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service on behalf of respondent- State.

4.

With consent of learned counsel for applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent - State the application is taken up for final hearing.

2 Cri.A.2163.14 5.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there has been delay as applicant is in jail and there was no male member in the family to prosecute the case for filing appeal in the High court. Thus, delay may be condoned. 6.

In the interest of justice, for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay stands condoned. 7.

Criminal application No. 2163 of 2014 stands disposed of accordingly.

8.

Criminal Appeal Stamp No. 232 of 2014 be registered. 9.

On registering the same, Appeal stands Admitted. 10.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service on behalf of respondent- State in the appeal after admission. 11.

Paper-book be got prepared.

( A.I.S. CHEEMA, J. ) MTK