← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4265/2025disposed off

Popat Bansilal Rajput v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The District Collector And Another

2025-03-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade4 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:9474-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 916 WRIT PETITION NO. 4229 OF 2025 SUDHAKAR SHYAMRAO GAYAKE AGP for Respondents : Ms. M.L. Sangeet 917 WRIT PETITION NO. 4230 OF 2025 BAPU KASHINATH NAIK AGP for Respondents: Mrs. P.J. Bharad 918 WRIT PETITION NO. 4231 OF 2025 ANGURI SATISH CHAK AGP for Respondents: Mr. V. M. Kagne 921 WRIT PETITION NO. 4237 OF 2025 ANUPAMA SANTRAM UNCHADE AGP for Respondents: Mr. A.V. Lavte 922 WRIT PETITION NO. 4238 OF 2025 ANUSAYA DINESH MUSALE 1/4

AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.R Wakale 923 WRIT PETITION NO. 4239 OF 2025 KUSUMBAI TULSHIRAM RILE AGP for Respondents: Mrs. V.N. Patil-Jadhav 924 WRIT PETITION NO. 4240 OF 2025 DEVIDAS VINAYAK VALLE THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROGUH THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AGP for Respondents: Ms. P.V. Diggikar 925 WRIT PETITION NO. 4241 OF 2025 VAISHALI AMOL JADHAV AGP for Respondents: Ms. A.S. Mantri 927 WRIT PETITION NO. 4243 OF 2025 SAVITA DEVIDAS RATHOD THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROGUH THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AGP for Respondents: Ms. M.L. Sangeet 2/4

928 WRIT PETITION NO. 4244 OF 2025 GORAKH VAIJINATH PAWAR AGP for Respondents: Mr. M.M. Nerlikar 929 WRIT PETITION NO. 4248 OF 2025 PRATAP SURYAKANT SAMNDARSWALE THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROGUH THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AGP for Respondents: Mr. M.M. Nerlikar 942 WRIT PETITION NO. 4265 OF 2025 POPAT BANSILAL RAJPUT AGP for Respondents: Mr. A.V. Lavte 947 WRIT PETITION NO. 4276 OF 2025 SANDIP LAXMAN SIRSATH AGP for Respondents: Mr. R.K. Ingole

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 28.03.2025 3/4

PER COURT :

The petitioners in all these petitions are soliciting early decision on their applications seeking FL-III linceses under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and Maharashtra Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953, which are pending before respondent no. 1.

2.

We have heard both the sides.

3.

We dispose of all these petitions with a direction to respondent no. 1 to take up the petitioners' individual applications for consideration and decide it as expeditiously as possible and in accordance with law, in any case within eight weeks, if those have not been already decided. ( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) mkd/- 4/4