← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/1689/2017disposed off

Rabindersing Kuldeepsing Chahel v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2017-04-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice T.V. Nalawade3 pages

1 Applns 1513,1598,1689 & 1746/2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD Criminal Application No.1513 of 2017 Nayana w/o Kiran Khadke.

.. Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

.. Respondent.

---- Shri. V.D. Hon, Senior Counsel holding for Shri. Ashwin V. Hon, Advocate, for applicant.

Shri. M.M. Nerlikar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent.

Shri. V.P. Patil, Advocate, to assist the Additional Public Prosecutor.

---- With Criminal Application No.1598 of 2017

1) Anil s/o Laxman Choudhari 2) Makrand s/o Umakant Dhake.

.. Applicants.

Versus

* The State of Maharashtra.

.. Respondent.

---- Shri. Swapnil S. Patil, Advocate, for applicants. Shri. M.M. Nerlikar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent.

---- With Criminal Application No.1689 of 2017 Rabindersing Kuldeepsing Chahel. .. Applicant.

Versus

2 Applns 1513,1598,1689 & 1746/2017 The State of Maharashtra And Another.

.. Respondents.

---- Shri. Ajit M. Gholap, Advocate, for applicant. Shri. M.M. Nerlikar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondents.

---- With Criminal Application No.1746 of 2017 Narendra s/o Supdu More.

.. Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra And Another.

.. Respondents.

---- Shri. Ajit M. Gholap, Advocate, for applicant. Shri. M.M. Nerlikar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondents.

Shri. V.P. Patil, Advocate, to assist the Additional Public Prosecutor.

---- Coram: T.V. NALAWADE, J.

Date: 20 April 2017 ORDER:

1) After hearing arguments of the learned Senior Counsel and other learned counsels for the applicants in all these applications, when this Court expressed that the

3 Applns 1513,1598,1689 & 1746/2017 Court is not inclined to grant the relief, the learned Senior Counsel for the applicant from Criminal Application No.1513/2017 and the learned counsels for applicants from other matters submitted that, on instructions, they want to withdraw the applications. So, all the criminal applications are disposed of as withdrawn.

2) It needs to be noted that the previous crime registered against the Managing Committee members (CR No.90/2010) is being investigated by the C.I.D. The present matter is connected matter of that offence and so it is desirable that the investigation of the two crimes (viz. Crime No.16/2017 and Crime No.90/2010) is made by one and the same agency in stead of allowing it to be made by two separate agencies. Copy of the order is to be sent to the Government by the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. Authenticated copy is allowed to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) rsl