← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3583/2007disposed offdismissed for default

The Public Information Officer, Office Of Dd Of Education Aurangabad v. Gouri Sudhir Daokhare And ANR

2018-03-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice T.V. Nalawade,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal2 pages

914WP_3583_2007 (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 WRIT PETITION NO. 3583 OF 2007 * The Public Information Officer and Assistant Director of Education, Office of the Deputy Director of Education, Aurangbad.

...Petitioner

VERSUS

1.

Sow Gouri Sudhir Daokhare R/o C/o Pratim Mohanrao Nirale "Utkarsha" Gajanan Colony Sahayognagar, Beed District Beed.

2.

The State Information Commission Through its Secretary, Aurangabad.

...Respondents

.....

Mr.A.S. Bayas, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr.M.C. Syed, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

.....

CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED : 23rd MARCH, 2018.

ORAL JUDGMENT:- 1.

In the petition, the Information Officer of the office of Director of Education has challenged the order of Information Officer and also the State Information Commissioner by which penalty of Rs.250/- per day for causing delay in supplying information is imposed. Both the sides are heard. The

914WP_3583_2007 (2) submissions made by the learned counsel for original complainant shows that, he wants only to receive the information and has no grievance against the petitioner. In view of the nature of allegations and the nature of information sought this Court hold that the order of penalty needs to be set aside. The Writ Petition is allowed. The order of penalty is set aside. Rule made absolute in those terms.

(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (T.V. NALAWADE) JUDGE JUDGE Sameer/Mar-18