← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4934/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Bhartiya Mahila Shikshan Va Prashiksan Sanstha Through Its President And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-08-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Gavhane3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4934 OF 2017

1) Bhartiya Mahila Shikshan Va Prashiksan Sanstha at Udgir, Tq-Udgir, Dist-Latur, Through it's President,

2) Saint Dyaneshwar Mauli Prathmik Vidyamandir, at Tirupati Colony, Bidar Road, Tq. Udgir, Dist-Latur.

...PETITIONERS

VERSUS

1) The State of Maharashtra, Through it's Chief Secretary, School and Education and Sport Departmnent, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 001,

2) The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Latur,

3) The Deputy Director of Education, Latur Division, Latur, Tq. & Dist-Latur,

4) Director of Education, (Primary), Maharashtra State, Pune.

...RESPONDENTS

...

Mr.Sanjay Kolhare Advocate for Petitioners.

Mr.A.V. Deshmukh, A.G.P. for Resp.

Nos.1, 3 and 4.

Mr.P.R. Tandale Advocate for Resp. No.2.

...

CORAM: SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.

DATE : 20TH AUGUST, 2019 ORDER :

1.

After hearing learned counsel, it appears that proposal for staffing pattern as suggested under communication dated 14th August, 2014 (Exhibit G collectively) is submitted and the same is yet not being responded to.

2.

Having regard to that, since it is being stated that respondent No.2 - education officer has now been authorized to decide such proposals, it would be expedient that respondent No.2 shall decide on said proposal, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order, if

not already decided.

3.

The petition, with the aforesaid observations, stands disposed of.

(S.M. GAVHANE, J.) [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] asb/AUG19