Balasaheb Tukaram Palve And Others v. Sopan Yadav Palve And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5319 OF 2018 BALASAHEB TUKARAM PALVE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

SOPAN YADAV PALVE AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Respondent 1 : Shri Shirsat S.R. h/f Shri Jadhavar S.S. AGP for Respondent 2: Shri Yadav-Lonikar S.R. ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Dated: September 05, 2018 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

None appears for the petitioners. Learned Advocate for the respondents and learned AGP submit that even on the last occasion, none appeared for the petitioners.

2.

There is a statutory remedy in filing a Second Revision under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code (MLR Code) in view of the pronouncement of the Honourable Apex Court in the matter of Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani Vs. State of Maharashtra [2015

(6) Mh.L.J. 915].

3.

This Court has not granted any interim relief to the petitioners. Notice was issued on 13.6.2018 and a further order was passed on 13.7.2018 as the petitioners did not supply copies for issuance of notices.

akl/d

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2 - WRIT PETITION NO. 5319 OF 2018 4.

In view of the judicial pronouncement in Gurudassing (supra), this petition is disposed off. The petitioners would be at liberty to approach the revisional authority under Section 256 of the MLR Code. If such a revision is filed, on/or before 6.10.2018, the time spent by the petitioners in this Court from 5.4.2018 till the passing of this order, Digitally signed by Ajay Kishanrao Losarwar Date:

2018.09.06 10:10:57 +0530 Ajay Kishanrao Losarwar would be a good ground for seeking condonation of delay. ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ...

akl/d