← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/13885/2019delay condonatedrejected

Vaishali Babasaheb Torne And ANR v. Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its Branch Manager, Pune And ANR

2022-08-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 937 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13885 OF 2019 IN FAST/10363/2019 VAISHALI BABASAHEB TORNE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR ITS BRANCH MANAGER, PUNE AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr.Shaikh Majit S.

Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. S. S. Jangada h/f. Mr. Shaikh Joyeb.

...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 26.08.2022 PER COURT :

.

Heard. The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 694 days which is caused because the applicants were not aware of passing of impugned award. The learned counsel for the respondent No.2 opposed the application and submits that if the delay is condoned then the interest for the said period shall not be granted. 2.

The respondent No.1 - Insurance Company though served but remained absent.

3.

In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 694 days stands condoned subject to

condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay.

4.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-