Ratnu Namdeo Panchal And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

941-delay.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD ...

941 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11076 OF 2014 IN FAST/11888/2014 WITH CA/11077/2014 IN FAST/12311/2014 WITH CA/11079/2014 IN FAST/9428/2014 WITH CA/11084/2014 IN FAST/10219/2014 WITH CA/11085/2014 IN FAST/10275/2014 WITH CA/11086/2014 IN FAST/10827/2014 WITH CA/11087/2014 IN FAST/10804/2014 WITH CA/11088/2014 IN FAST/10224/2014 WITH CA/11091/2014 IN FAST/10262/2014 WITH CA/11092/2014 IN FAST/9385/2014 VITHAL JANARDHAN KIRDANT AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Gaikwad T. G.

AGP for Respondents State: Mr. P. N. Kutti Puthenkulam Advocate for Respondent No.2: Mr. B. A.Shinde ...

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.

DATE :

9th October, 2015 PER COURT :

1.

These are applications for condonation of delay. Mr.Gaikwad, the learned counsel submits that the applicants have given undertaking that for the delayed period, they would not claim statutory benefit, in case the compensation amount is enhanced. In companion references, the court has granted more compensation, against which the acquiring body has filed appeal. Present appeal can be considered alongwith it. 1/2

941-delay.doc 2.

For the reasons stated in the application and bonafide shown, the applications are allowed. Delay is condoned. Civil applications are disposed of. ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) JPC 2/2