Bombay High CourtWP/8577/2017disposed offdismissed for default

M/S R Rajkotiya And Company Through Partners Rajesh Chandulal Rajkotiya And Another v. Omprakash Sitaram Agrawal And Others

2017-07-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh2 pages

(Order) (1) W.P. No. 08577 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Writ Petition No. 08577 of 2017 District : Jalgaon M/s. R. Rajkotiya and Company, Registered Partnership Firm, Ganesh Building, 122, Navipeth, Jalgaon, Taluka & District Jalgaon, Through Partners, A. Shri Rajesh Chandulal Rajkotiya, Age : 45 years, Occupation : Business.

B. Sau. Sangeeta Rajesh Rajkotiya, Age : 44 years, Occupation : Business, .. Petitioners Both R/o. Navi Peth, Jalgaon.

(Original defendant no.01) versus

1. Shri Omprakash Sitaram Agrawal, Age : 55 years, Occupation : Business, R/o. Ganesh Kunj, Akashwani Chauk, Jalgaon.

2. Smt. Sushilabai Ramnarayan Agrawal, Age : 78 years, Occupation : Business.

3. Shri Vinod Ramnarayan Agrawal, Age : 51 years, Occupation : Business.

4. Shri Pramod Ramnarayan Agrawal, Age : 45 years, Occupation : Business.

5. Shri Kailas Ramnarayan Agrawal, Age : 42 years, Occupation : Business.

All R/o. Ganesh Building, 122, Navi Peth, Jalgaon.

(Order) (2) W.P. No. 08577 of 2017

6. Sau. Madhuri Ashutosh Agrawal, Age : 45 years, Occupation ; Business, Household, R/o. C/o. Shri Ashutosh Zunzunwala, Maharashtra Medical Stores, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Akola, Taluka & Dist. Akola.

.. Respondents (Nos.01 to 06 -

7. Sau. Shantabai Vasudeo Agrawal, Original plaintiffs Age : 66 years, & Occupation : Business, Household, No.07 - Original R/o. Ganesh Building, defendant) 122, Navipeth, Jalgaon.

...........

Mr. M.M. Bhokarikar, Advocate, for petitioners. Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate, for respondent no.01 (caveator). ...........

CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 10TH JULY 2017 ORAL ORDER :

01.

After hearing learned Counsel for parties, learned Counsel for petitioners reconciles to that, against the order impugned, a recourse can be had pursuant to Section 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

02.

In view of the above, the Writ Petition is not entertained and is disposed of.

( Sunil P. Deshmukh ) JUDGE ...........

puranik / WP8577.17